What is Forecast Accuracy (MAPE / WAPE)?
Forecast accuracy measures how close your forecasts are to actuals, using error percentages that work across revenue, demand, cost, or volume. MAPE shows the average absolute % error per period; WAPE weights error by scale, so big-dollar periods or segments drive the result.
These metrics matter because forecast error turns into working capital drag, margin dilution (expedites, waste, discounting), and weaker capital allocation decisions.
Formula
Example
Assume 12 periods with total actuals of $1,200,000 and total forecasts of $1,150,000, and the average per-period MAPE computed from the underlying points is 6.5%.
Estimated total absolute error ≈ 6.5% × $1,200,000 = $78,000, so estimated MAE per period ≈ $78,000 ÷ 12 = $6,500.
Net bias ≈ ($1,150,000 − $1,200,000) ÷ $1,200,000 = −4.2%, meaning forecasts are systematically low (under-forecasting).
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I use MAPE or WAPE to judge forecast accuracy for my business?
Use WAPE when volumes vary a lot across periods/items (big months should matter more). Use MAPE when each period/item should count equally and actuals aren’t near zero.
Why does my MAPE look “terrible” even when the forecast seems close?
MAPE blows up when actuals are small or zero. One low-actual period can dominate the average % error. In those cases, rely more on WAPE (or other metrics like sMAPE/MASE) and segment out low-volume periods.
What does “Net bias” mean, and how do I read the sign?
It shows systematic over/under-forecasting: Bias % = (Total Forecasts − Total Actuals) / Total Actuals. Positive = overall over-forecast; negative = overall under-forecast.
How do I translate a MAPE % into “$ error” I can explain to stakeholders?
Convert it to an estimated absolute error in dollars: Estimated total absolute error ≈ MAPE% × Total Actuals, then Estimated MAE per period ≈ (MAPE% × Total Actuals) / # periods.
Sources & Methodology